TO: pcs.noitadnuof|ce.notlet#pcs.noitadnuof|ce.notlet
FROM: pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj#pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj
CC: pcs.noitadnuof|draillima#pcs.noitadnuof|draillima, pcs.noitadnuof|vrestsil-ce#pcs.noitadnuof|vrestsil-ce
SUBJECT: Re: Ethics Committee Vote - Project Milliard
Dear Chairman Elton,
I would like to raise objections to Project Milliard. The issue I take with Project Milliard lies in the fact that the subject needed for the project is required to be "between 1 and 18 months of age". In my somewhat limited medical knowledge, I do not see the reason why we need several infant subjects, rather than several grown subjects. In addition, we're also going to age them artificially later on, so I assume that this is redundant and unnecessary. Is there a reason that I'm not seeing?
Thanks for your time,
- John K. Paulos, PhD
TO: pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj#pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj
FROM: pcs.noitadnuof|draillima#pcs.noitadnuof|draillima
SUBJECT: Re: Re: Ethics Committee Vote - Project Milliard
Dr. Paulos,
I believe I can answer this question. Essentially, in order for Project Milliard to function properly, the subject needs to be fully loyal to the Foundation. Procedure MILLIARD-ASTRAL makes the subject extremely suggestible, and even the slightest amount of bias can cause the subject to switch to somebody else's side. There's another reason for it, although it's quite complicated.
Now, you know everybody has a brain. Pretend like each brain is built in a completely different way, but there are two types of brains that mostly everybody's resembles: Type A and Type B. In order for Procedure MILLIARD-ASTRAL to work correctly, we need a Type B brain. As for why we need them to be young, well, the hallucinogenics required to implant memories of complete loyalty simply work better when they're young. We can't guarantee full viability in an older subject.
I hope that answers your questions.
- Milliard
TO: pcs.noitadnuof|draillima#pcs.noitadnuof|draillima
FROM: pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj#pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj
SUBJECT: Re: Re: Re: Ethics Committee Vote - Project Milliard
Dear Dr. Milliard,
I think I have found a solution to this problem that doesn't require the dulling process described earlier. First, we identify a Type B subject among our current pool of D-class personnel. Then, we give them a strong dosage of Class-F amnestics and personality restructuring agents, essentially destroying the subject's long-term memory and personality.
Then, we continue with the hallucinogenic agent treatment and MILLIARD-ASTRAL, until the subject is suitable for use in Project Milliard. Using this method, rather than using anywhere from 3-10 infant lives (depending on the success rate of the procedure), we will only have to use one of our already-condemned D-class personnel.
Thank you for your consideration,
- John K. Paulos, PhD
TO: pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj#pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj
FROM: pcs.noitadnuof|draillima#pcs.noitadnuof|draillima
SUBJECT: Re: Re: Re: Re: Ethics Committee Vote - Project Milliard
Dr. Paulos,
As much as I would like to take these actions, there are some problems.
First of all, the personality restructuring agents that are currently in the Foundation's possession irreversibly damage the frontal lobe, which needs to be intact in order for Procedure MILLIARD-ASTRAL to take place.
Secondly, simply due to the nature of the Type B brain, Class-F amnestic treatment is impossible. You see, Type B brains are actually more resistant to the chemical treatment, making amnestic treatment difficult. However, this resistance is developed in the late 20's, meaning that younger subjects are more easily treated with amnestic compounds.
Thirdly, we are unlikely to find a Type B brain in any D-class. In most cases, Type-B subjects are orderly and tend to be lawful or submissive. Most of these people are not D-class and are therefore out of our reach.
Again, my sincerest apologies.
- Milliard
TO: pcs.noitadnuof|ce.notlet#pcs.noitadnuof|ce.notlet
FROM: pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj#pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj
CC: pcs.noitadnuof|draillima#pcs.noitadnuof|draillima, pcs.noitadnuof|vrestsil-ce#pcs.noitadnuof|vrestsil-ce
SUBJECT: Objection to Project Milliard
Dear Chairman Elton,
With all due respect, I fail to see the purpose of Project Milliard.
There isn't a purpose that Project Milliard fulfills that isn't already fulfilled by our CK-Class scenario detectors or the observation network we already have throughout the internet. Almost all anomalies currently in containment are protected under these two programs.
As for the Interspace Entities, we already have enough of a weapons payload to blow them out of the sky, if need be. I won't worry.
Sincerely,
- John K. Paulos, PhD
TO: pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj#pcs.noitadnuof|soluapkj
FROM: pcs.noitadnuof|ce.notlet#pcs.noitadnuof|ce.notlet
CC: pcs.noitadnuof|draillima#pcs.noitadnuof|draillima, pcs.noitadnuof|vrestsil-ce#pcs.noitadnuof|vrestsil-ce
SUBJECT: Re: Objection to Project Milliard
To Dr. Paulos,
I've attached last year's containment breach statistics to this email. The important detail is what, exactly, caused these containment breaches. Out of the 41 containment breaches we had in 2017, three were caused by gross negligence. Five were caused by equipment failure. Seven were caused by improperly documenting and/or classifying anomalies. The remainder were caused by unexpected behavior on the part of hostile reality-bending entities.
You must realize that rendering several people comatose is far outweighed by the potential to stop these breaches before they happen. Yes, we have CSD's and all the other paratech. But it still isn't enough.
We have to weigh the costs here, Paulos. If taking an infant straight from their mother is the only way, it's the only way.
- Elton